I believe the "beyond reasonable doubt" part that is necessary to convict a criminal. I believe that it has worked more times that it has failed over these years. So, in the case of the Air India bombings, what the *&^%(*& happened??
As far as it was playing out, they had the right people and the right evidence. Where did it all go so wrong? I am not wholly convinced that these men did not do it as I am that the prosecution screwed up a high profile case yet again. How many times do they seem to get loopholes to get the high profile cases off and no one has that savvy for the lesser profile cases?
Something happened in this case and someone needs to figure it out; QUICKLY. The families of those lost in this tragedy deserve no less!!
Ciao.
CANOE -- CNEWS - Law: Air India defendants cleared
Wednesday, March 16, 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment